Wednesday, November 18, 2009

What happened to the Scribd Accounts?

We all know Bill Christy, he's the guy who wrote "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" to which I actively contributed, as one can see in this post. He's also the one who publicly said "I would have shot Bruce McKay as well," as noted in this post. He also argued that Floyd was in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), now he says he isn't. And we know that he calls blacks he doesn't like "Niggers" and incessantly follows me around, and has been posting most of my SSN number that he found on an obscure document that I accidentally posted 3 years ago because he can't stand the fact that I exposed his Janus-faced nature.

Well yesterday I get wind of the fact that he lied and told Scribd.com that he was the sole author of the material and that I was in DCMA copyright violation. Scribd.com thus removed "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" and my entire account, on a first strike. Not knowing what the heck happened, I posted it back up in another of my Scribd.com accounts, then once Scribd.com told me what happened I apologized and sent them the proof that I had editorial and content input and they initially told me I should write a counter-affidavit, which I said I would do.

As all of my public documents, with thousands and thousands of reads on them were on Scribd.com, I wrote them back when they initially told me I could write a counter-affidavit. They were quite rude and Mr. Bently lied, telling me there was a "zero tolerance" policy on Copyright, but that's not true, read their own website here and here:
"DMCA copyright infringement takedown notification policy

Submitted Feb 13 by Jason Bentley

It is our policy to respond to clear, legally valid notices of alleged copyright infringement that comply with the criteria established by Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") of 1998. In addition, we terminate without notice the accounts of users that we determine are repeat infringers based on a "three-strikes" policy."

"As an Internet service provider, Scribd must comply with the terms of the DMCA that require us to terminate the accounts of users determined to be "repeat infringers.""

Swift action for policy offenders: On every document upload page, there is a prominent warning message and mandatory check box displayed to help ensure that people understand and comply with Scribd’s Terms of Service. Repeat copyright infringers are banned from Scribd."

But this is at most two strikes, and the second violation (on the same case) came before I received notification from Scribd that I was allegedly in violation, but nonetheless they have removed my ability to file a counter-affidavit. So now I have to sue these guys -- who will not tell me the name of their corporate counsel -- naturally. I'll be down at the ACLU tomorrow, the same ACLU who wrote the Mass SJC briefs for Derrick Gillenwater after I sent him over there as Boston Bob.

Moral of the story: Always keep your emails, never trust Bill Christy -- he's a slippery, slimy sort of LE, kind of like what the folks at MASSCOPS called Marty Dunn: A slime bag.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Derrick Gillenwater settles with Kevin Barron, now he's on to the racist jerk, Citibank's Carlo Caramanna.

Read it and weep, Carlo. That will be the last time you ever wrongfully dishonor a check to a Holder in Due Course and threaten to arrest a couple of black men without just cause.

-BB

Monday, May 11, 2009

ACLU full panel appeal slows settlement in Gillenwater v. Barron.

I get it know. Mr. Gillenwater explained to the law students that when the pending low-ball settlement offer was made, the Single Justice had done his dirtywork and so that was the only issue on the table.

But now that the Good Guys have gone upstairs to the Full Bench, Kevin Barron has a bigger problem now and he can't buy Mr. Gillenwater off at that price.

Think about it: It really is two separate and distinct issues because to rip him off on the Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is one thing; to have his goddamn First Amendment Rights taken away without any finding of fact is another thing altogether.

Keep going Mr. Gillenwater, make them make you whole again for the wrongs they have visited against you.

BB

Want to know how the Settlement Game goes in Boston? The little guy gets fleeced.

First you sue the lawyer who fucked you over.

Then you hire another lawyer to go after that lawyer.

Then the first lawyer sends clients to the lawyer who is supposed to be zealously representing you against against him.

Then the lawyer who is supposed to be zealously representing you takes a powder; tells you "there's no way we can really beat this...." or "there's a reasonable settlement on the table, you should take it" when it's really just some scraps of food or stale meat from the master's table.

Did it ever occur to the first lawyer that there's someone in his office who tells the Truth to the poor client who is getting fleeced?

Trust me on this.

BB

Thursday, May 7, 2009

ACLU appeals to full panel in Gillenwater v. Barron First Amendment Rape Case, 2009 SJ 165.

Whooooooooopieeeeee.....

Look Kevin,

Just as I suggested, they agree. I don't have a copy of it yet but I telephoned the Court today to check and yes indeed Kevin Barron is headed for the Big Time.

Of course Mr. Gillenwater might settle his case and part of said settlement might be a withdrawal of that Pleading, and I might encourage him to do so, only because the Courts have consistently shown him that they do not give a damn about his rights.

Unfortunate that the full Court might not get to hear this, but when I retrieve a copy of the Full Court Appeal I will post it right here.

But it is at least fortunate that Mr. Gillenwater has managed to walk away with some money and some dignity after the reaming he took from Kevin Barron, the Courts, and that certain other high-profile Boston Attorney who settled out several weeks ago.

CODA.....

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Heroin-indicted Kevin L. Barron exposed to Federal Jurists and theatre-going Boston residents.

I understand it, one of our crew was out last night at the production and did announce this case in open theatre, did mention the laudable efforts of the ACLU/Proskauer-Rose and did further pass fliers to the audience and to some panelists, who included Freddie Mac's Ralph Boyd and a veritable who's who of Civil Rights in Boston:

Jennifer Braceras, Ralph Boyd, Wayne Budd, Hon. Nathaniel Gorton, Brent Henry, Daniel Kelly, Steven Maler, John Montgomery, Hon. F. Dennis Saylor IV, Harvey Silverglate (Three Felonies a Day -- How the Feds Target the Innocent), Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, Hon. Rya W. Zobel.

I think going forward, it will be important to keep each and every one of these individuals up to speed on this lynching of Procedural and Substantive Justice, which is clearly steeped in race and economics. From what I understand, our Man in the Field drove home that point by noting that we have not yet become a fully-enlighted society because we still have to legitimately wonder if race played, and continues to play a factor in the Unconstitutional Orders from the Massachusetts Courts, issued without so much as a single Finding of Fact.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Corrupt Massachusetts Supreme Court dodges the Racism, First Amendment/Civil Rights issues in Gillenwater v. Barron, 2009-SJ-165.

As the ACLU's Supreme Judicial Court Petition and Request for Declaratory Judgment in Gillenwater v. Barron, 2009-SJ-165 proves, racism and legal manipulation is alive and well right here in Boston; the Courts and Kevin Barron treated Derrick Gillenwater just like a nigger slave who took lashes. They took all of his First Amendment Rights away to speak and to even file pleadings in his legal malpractice case against heroin-indicted Barron and another high-profile attorney who settled because of my blogs!

When scumbag Barron ran to the Court and made them reverse the Unconstitutional Orders, the Supreme Court promptly denied the ACLU Petition as moot, which will have no effect whatsoever on me running Kevin Barron right into the ground; the lying bastid, using other dirty judges to trump Derrick Gillenwater's First Amendment Rights with impunity.

This makes America a very scary place to live when your basic Civil Rights can be stripped away and the High Court simply does not give a damn. Time to go to the full panel, then on to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.